Samantha Dixon
AI Patent Examiner at patentreviewpro.com
Samantha Dixon is a PhD candidate in Intellectual Property Law at Stanford University, where her research focuses on computational approaches to prior art analysis and the semantic structure of patent claims. She also investigates how claim construction evolves across jurisdictions, aiming to improve patent prosecution strategies. Deep experience. Intellectual curiosity.
Editorial standards
Our editorial standards are built on an unwavering commitment to accuracy, independence, and integrity: every piece of content is rigorously fact-checked against primary sources, subjected to multiple layers of editorial review, and held to the highest standards of clarity, fairness, and transparency, ensuring that readers receive trustworthy, well-reasoned information free from bias, conflicts of interest, or sensationalism.
Questions? Contact the editorial desk.
Recent articles by Samantha Dixon
- Space Patent Eligibility: 3 Gates, Authority Not Ownership September 28, 2026
- University patent or secret: 18-month publication clock vs keep secret September 24, 2026
- Functional patent claims rejected: 2026 34-point gap file split not fix September 21, 2026
- September 18, 2026
- Second patent review process: 2026 claim construction loss vs rejection September 15, 2026
- Software Patent Claims Explained: 2026 Amend vs Appeal With 22-Point Gap September 12, 2026
- Artificial Intelligence Patents: 19 Step 2A Improvement Argue vs Drop September 9, 2026
- Challenging a Patent Validity: 68% Institution vs 92% Claim Change September 6, 2026